Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Johannes Richter's avatar

Fact-checking is a developing science and it's unsurprising that fact-checkers have their own biases. However, it's also an extention of the burgeoning field of science communication. A journalist aware of the role and impact of biases is still leagues ahead of a "do-my-own-researcher" who thinks he's being objective and unbiased.

We shouldn't confuse the wonkiness of mass fact-checks such as on social media with the integrity of people and systems that are trying to separate the wheat from the chaff using formalised tools. That's after all how science developed - an earnest attempt at introducing professionalism, rigour and reproducibility into what would otherwise be endeavours by enthusiasts operating in isolation.

Expand full comment
Akash's avatar

I had brought up this point in a previous article of yours, which I'd like reiterate in further detail. What muddies the water further is that these things have fallen into the fray of the culture wars, a chaotic phenomenon that has no place for rationality, good sense and query. Articles and fact-checkers are little more than rhetorical arms for the hardcore culture warriors on social media. The side that has legacy media, fact-checkers, academics, and even celebs, filmmakers, game developers, and influencers disseminating their viewpoints, has the superior arms and artillery. Even the most dishonest leftie can make any conservative look like a buffoon, with no regard to the truth (not a weapon). So now the masses too have a skin in this game, they just want to win against their dissidents, so they're ready to cede more latitude to the liberal establishment. There was a National Review article I'd read a few days ago, which argued that wokeness is not a product of value on its own. So it needs to attach itself to voguish IP's like Star Wars and LOTR, and even game franchises like Assassin's Creed, products that are not so easily replaceable due to their intrinsic historical and cultural value, and use them as platforms to propagandise. We could add all our cultural institutions into the mix too. Try this for size. If you don't like the Sequel Trilogy, can you make your own Star Wars that you've been watching for 4 decades? If you think Ivy League runs against your values, can you build your own, with the oldest institution that also has 4 centuries of prestige and endowment? This applied to Twitter too, until recently, and the prospect of losing even a single platform to the dissidents rippled into half a dozen meltdowns echoing across the internet. And the first victim of any war, be it literal or figurative, is the truth.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts