"It is easy to see why vigilantism is bad. It is because it is unlawful."
So, driving 65 in a 55 mph zone is "bad"? That law forced on us to restrict driving to 65 was to save GASOLINE, and yet was pitched 'to save lives' in order to manipulate the public!
You might also consider why it is and always has been the HUMAN condition. It pains …
"It is easy to see why vigilantism is bad. It is because it is unlawful."
So, driving 65 in a 55 mph zone is "bad"? That law forced on us to restrict driving to 65 was to save GASOLINE, and yet was pitched 'to save lives' in order to manipulate the public!
You might also consider why it is and always has been the HUMAN condition. It pains me to point out (because a concept so often misused by those I consider nearly my enemies) but it is true that BOTH sides in any conflict BELEIVE they had/have the the right of it. Taking the side you were taught is virtuous and right to commit your group's atrocities and discarding entirely that the OTHER side had equally important and persuasive reasons they thought, on EQUALLY "virtuous and persuasive" grounds means merely, and always, the victors write the history books!
"It is easy to see why vigilantism is bad. It is because it is unlawful."
So, driving 65 in a 55 mph zone is "bad"? That law forced on us to restrict driving to 65 was to save GASOLINE, and yet was pitched 'to save lives' in order to manipulate the public!
You might also consider why it is and always has been the HUMAN condition. It pains me to point out (because a concept so often misused by those I consider nearly my enemies) but it is true that BOTH sides in any conflict BELEIVE they had/have the the right of it. Taking the side you were taught is virtuous and right to commit your group's atrocities and discarding entirely that the OTHER side had equally important and persuasive reasons they thought, on EQUALLY "virtuous and persuasive" grounds means merely, and always, the victors write the history books!